pkg/settings/limits: swap out EvictTenant for TryCleanup#1889
Merged
Conversation
jmank88
requested review from
mchain0 and
pavel-raykov
and removed request for
patrickhuie19
|
👋 jmank88, thanks for creating this pull request! To help reviewers, please consider creating future PRs as drafts first. This allows you to self-review and make any final changes before notifying the team. Once you're ready, you can mark it as "Ready for review" to request feedback. Thanks! |
✅ API Diff Results -
|
pavel-raykov
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2026
Contributor
|
on the client side it requires an update in the code scope of: chainlink#21441 |
mchain0
approved these changes
Mar 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR swaps out EvictTenant for a context based internal
cleanupmethod. This keeps the API consistent and the effect controlled, rather than depending on the caller to understand the implementation.Another alternative, which is arguably simpler with no new API, is to implement the reaping noted in code.