Add test for missing @workflow_run_operation decorator #1290
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add a test case that validates a clear TypeError is raised when a handler method lacks the @workflow_run_operation decorator but the service interface expects an operation. Also fix the error branch of the test to use consistent service= keyword argument. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
tconley1428
approved these changes
Jan 21, 2026
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What was changed
MissingWorkflowRunDecoratorthat validates a clearTypeErroris raised when a handler method lacks the@workflow_run_operationdecorator but the service interface expects an operationtest_service_decorator_enforces_interface_conformanceto use consistentservice=keyword argument (the previous code path was never exercised since no test cases haderror_messageset)test_workflow_caller.pyWhy
Address TODO comment and increase test coverage of workflow_run_operation decorator.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code