Conversation
for (int i = 0; i < SHA256::DIGEST_SIZE; i++) change to for (int i = 0; i < (int) SHA256::DIGEST_SIZE; i++)
|
Thanks for your PR, I didn't write the sha256.cpp file (as explained in my blog post) but I've taken a look and DIGEST_SIZE is already defined as an int, what benefit would there be from casting it to an int again? |
|
After successful compilation, i am only gettinh the output as:- after that it doesn't display anything. |
|
it seems that the @subhutrivedi update just makes the warning
disappear with no further consequences.
@subhutrivedi, have you ever tried to change the |
|
Actually my problem got solved few minutes after I posted my comment that
day and I am also getting the desired output and yeah I have not tried to
change the _nDifficulty = 6; from the blockchain constructor to a lower
value.
…On Fri 12 Jul, 2019, 2:01 PM Ángel Bravo, ***@***.***> wrote:
it seems that the @subhutrivedi <https://github.com/subhutrivedi> update
*just* makes the warning
"comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
[-Wsign-compare]"
disappear with no further consequences.
After successful compilation, i am only gettinh the output as:-
Mining 1...
after that it doesn't display anything.
What could be the reason??
Please help me out to get the desired output.
@subhutrivedi <https://github.com/subhutrivedi>, have you ever tried to
change the _nDifficulty = 6; from the blockchain constructor to a lower
value?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5?email_source=notifications&email_token=AJ6AYLERAXZCYOJDTGWKU6LP7A6NJA5CNFSM4F7MMGOKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGODZZDG3Y#issuecomment-510800751>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJ6AYLDDQWGC76ONO2PZNXLP7A6NJANCNFSM4F7MMGOA>
.
|
4 participants
for (int i = 0; i < SHA256::DIGEST_SIZE; i++)
change to
for (int i = 0; i < (int) SHA256::DIGEST_SIZE; i++)