-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
build: add workflow and script to label PRs with merge conflicts #9461
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
c8d4a5c to
c9e67ca
Compare
|
/stdlib update-copyright-years |
kgryte
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall, this looks good to me. Given the recent reorganization of scripts in .github/workflows, @Planeshifter do you want to go ahead and move the check_merge_conflicts_prs script to a sub-folder?
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
- task: lint_filenames
status: passed
- task: lint_editorconfig
status: passed
- task: lint_markdown
status: na
- task: lint_package_json
status: na
- task: lint_repl_help
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_src
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_cli
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_examples
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_tests
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
status: na
- task: lint_python
status: na
- task: lint_r
status: na
- task: lint_c_src
status: na
- task: lint_c_examples
status: na
- task: lint_c_benchmarks
status: na
- task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
status: na
- task: lint_shell
status: passed
- task: lint_typescript_declarations
status: passed
- task: lint_typescript_tests
status: na
- task: lint_license_headers
status: passed
---
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
- task: lint_filenames
status: passed
- task: lint_editorconfig
status: passed
- task: lint_markdown
status: na
- task: lint_package_json
status: na
- task: lint_repl_help
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_src
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_cli
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_examples
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_tests
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
status: na
- task: lint_python
status: na
- task: lint_r
status: na
- task: lint_c_src
status: na
- task: lint_c_examples
status: na
- task: lint_c_benchmarks
status: na
- task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
status: na
- task: lint_shell
status: passed
- task: lint_typescript_declarations
status: passed
- task: lint_typescript_tests
status: na
- task: lint_license_headers
status: passed
---
638c10d to
ef71923
Compare
|
Warning Review the following alerts detected in dependencies. According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
|
/stdlib update-copyright-years |
Resolves stdlib-js/metr-issue-tracker#131.
Description
This pull request:
Related Issues
Questions
As currently implemented, the script only fetches the latest 100 open PRs to process, with no pagination implemented. This seems sufficient to me to avoid having to deal with cursor-based pagination in the GitHub GraphQL API, but it's a caveat to keep in mind and which could be revisited if deemed necessary; one alternative would be to only process the PRs updated from the last workflow run.
Other
No.
Checklist
AI Assistance
If you answered "yes" above, how did you use AI assistance?
Disclosure
@stdlib-js/reviewers