Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughFixes YAML formatting for an existing Changes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
REQUEST to Remove wolfxy.com from the blocklistAbout the site The project operates transparently and does not engage in phishing, malware distribution, or deceptive practices. All smart contract interactions are user-initiated and visible on-chain. Project credibility
The issue When users visit wolfxy.com, Phantom displays a warning stating: “This dApp could be malicious”
This warning appears to be a false positive triggered by heuristic or transaction simulation limitations. The application performs legitimate blockchain transactions, and in some cases wallet simulation may not fully interpret dynamic transaction flows — which can incorrectly trigger protective warnings. The domain does not appear in the public blocklist repository and does not engage in any unsafe behavior. Clarification
Request We respectfully request a manual review of wolfxy.com and removal from the malicious/unsafe classification. This appears to be a false positive and is negatively impacting legitimate users. If additional verification steps, code review details, or transaction simulation logs are required, we are happy to provide them. |
69e9719 to
8099e8d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@whitelist.yaml`:
- Line 34: The PR adds wolfxy.com to whitelist.yaml but whitelist/fuzzylist are
not enabled (per README) and build.js lacks whitelist-vs-blocklist conflict
handling, so the warning won't be cleared; update the active detection source
and conflict resolution: enable whitelist/fuzzylist usage as described in README
or change the detector to consult whitelist.yaml/fuzzylist during runtime, and
modify build.js to implement logic that checks whitelist entries (exact and
fuzzy) before applying blocklist rules so whitelisted domains like wolfxy.com
are exempt from blocking.
| - url: revoke.cash | ||
| - url: nftplus.io No newline at end of file | ||
| - url: nftplus.io | ||
| - url: wolfxy.com No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Whitelist-only addition likely won’t clear the reported warning.
Line 34 adds wolfxy.com to whitelist.yaml, but based on README.md (Line 19-35) whitelist/fuzzylist are not currently active, and build.js (Line 1-25) has no whitelist-over-blocklist conflict handling. This PR likely won’t satisfy the stated objective unless the active detection source is also updated.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@whitelist.yaml` at line 34, The PR adds wolfxy.com to whitelist.yaml but
whitelist/fuzzylist are not enabled (per README) and build.js lacks
whitelist-vs-blocklist conflict handling, so the warning won't be cleared;
update the active detection source and conflict resolution: enable
whitelist/fuzzylist usage as described in README or change the detector to
consult whitelist.yaml/fuzzylist during runtime, and modify build.js to
implement logic that checks whitelist entries (exact and fuzzy) before applying
blocklist rules so whitelisted domains like wolfxy.com are exempt from blocking.

Adds
wolfxy.comto whitelist.yaml.Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
New Features
Notes: These changes normalize whitelist formatting and increase the domain list by one, improving reliability of domain checks without other functional changes.