Skip to content

Conversation

@lbarcziova
Copy link
Member

@centosinfra-prod-github-app
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Member

@nforro nforro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

| `arch` | Processor architecture | `x86_64` |
| `distro` | Distribution/compose being tested | `centos-stream-9`, `centos-stream-10` |
| `dist-git-branch` | Target branch of the dist-git PR | `rawhide`, `f41`, `f40`, `epel-9`, `epel-10.1` |
| `initiator` | Who triggered the test | `fedora-ci` (vs `packit` for upstream) |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just wondering if the upstream note can't actually be confusing for users who haven't heard of Packit yet. I would perhaps convert this to a tip ("TIP: you can differentiate between Fedora CI and Packit upstream test jobs with initiator") and place it below the table.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants