Skip to content

Conversation

@shreyaskunder
Copy link
Contributor

Related-To: VLCLJ-2678

Related-To: VLCLJ-2678

Signed-off-by: Shreyas Kunder <shreyas.kunder@intel.com>
Related-To: VLCLJ-2678

Signed-off-by: Shreyas Kunder <shreyas.kunder@intel.com>
Related-To: VLCLJ-2678

Signed-off-by: Shreyas Kunder <shreyas.kunder@intel.com>
Related-To: VLCLJ-2678

Signed-off-by: Shreyas Kunder <shreyas.kunder@intel.com>
LOG_DEBUG << "synchronize with completion of workload";
lzt::synchronize(command_queue, std::numeric_limits<uint64_t>::max());

size_t raw_data_size = 0;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please confirm, but I suspect this test does not need to run any workload. Since it is just an API param check.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes you are right. Removed running the workload.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems this test does not make sense any more since you cannot know how much size is available.
Instead seems there should be a test that sets a small buffer and confirms can read multiple times, concatenate data and call calculate and data is valid. This will be the most used case.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@shreyaskunder shreyaskunder Feb 11, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have modified this test to read the data completely using the small buffer. Let me know if this test is okay.

Cannot use the new decode and calculate here since it is still driver experimental. Will add that test scenario in embargo.

Related-To: VLCLJ-2678

Signed-off-by: Shreyas Kunder <shreyas.kunder@intel.com>
Related-To: VLCLJ-2678

Signed-off-by: Shreyas Kunder <shreyas.kunder@intel.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@matcabral matcabral left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changes look good. Please paste output of passing tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants