-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
refactor: add list/listPaginated pattern and reorganize schemas #15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
+503
−167
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
372433b
refactor: add list/listPaginated pattern and reorganize schemas
martinsaposnic 73d0431
fix: biome formatting
martinsaposnic 65406b9
refactor(customer): use discriminated union for lookup schema
martinsaposnic 5c433b1
feat(customer): add CustomerLookupToolSchema for MCP tools
martinsaposnic 0d686c4
fix(pagination): add validation constraints to PaginatedInputSchema
martinsaposnic 62de449
fix: biome formatting
martinsaposnic 30bdcba
Stop using discriminated union. MCP can't handle it
martinsaposnic File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CustomerLookupInputSchemais documented as “exactly one identifier,” but the union of non‑strict objects will accept payloads with multiple identifiers (e.g.,{ id, email }) and silently strip extras. That can cause a caller to pass conflicting identifiers and still get a result based only on the first matching branch. If you need to enforce exclusivity, add.strict()and a refinement or use a discriminated union so multi‑field payloads are rejected.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
check 5c433b1