Conversation
|
@pat-s what do you think? I reckon it could be marked Stable, based on comparison with some of the other listed servers (would need to update the docs site too). |
|
Thanks for the PR! @pat-s, does this make sense to you? :) |
|
Yes, I think (and hope!) it falls under the "stable" category, given all the fixes we put on top of Dendrite. Thanks @bones-was-here! |
Signed-off-by: bones_was_here <bones_was_here@xonotic.org>
bones-was-here
force-pushed
the
bones_was_here/zendrite
branch
from
154df39 to
ea39a9d
Compare
HarHarLinks
added
the
needs decision
| licence = "AGPL-3.0-or-later" | ||
| website = "https://zendrite.pat-s.me/" | ||
| repository = "https://codefloe.com/pat-s/zendrite" | ||
| room = "#dendrite:matrix.org" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would rather leave it out than reusing another server's room here even though it is a fork. This feels misleading and will cause confusion to people expecting people ask about dendrite but then end up asking about Zendrite.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have no strong opinion on that. Just wanna note that the channel members were asked if they wanna have both in the same room and the consensus was "yes".
But yes, it's likely confusing and maybe a distinct room would be better long-term.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it's fine for projects to share a room, if it is recognised officially enough as both projects' room to avoid the confusion MTRNord mentions. A definite way to do so, besides room name, could be room description.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rooms can also have multiple aliases to solve that.
5 participants
Description
Adds the Zendrite homeserver
Related issues
Role
Individual
Timeline
There’s no immediate deadline, so feel free to review this PR whenever you can.
Signoff
Please sign off your individual commits or whole pull request.