Add new clients to ecosystem/clients#3183
Add new clients to ecosystem/clients#3183dannycolin wants to merge 7 commits intomatrix-org:mainfrom
Conversation
|
For mactrix, please consider the discussion at #3176 :) |
Signed-off-by: Danny Colin <contact@dannycolin.com>
Signed-off-by: Danny Colin <contact@dannycolin.com>
Signed-off-by: Danny Colin <contact@dannycolin.com>
Signed-off-by: Danny Colin <contact@dannycolin.com>
dannycolin
force-pushed
the
update-clients
branch
from
7c31029 to
9defb05
Compare
Lets simply remove it for now. We can add it later when the maintainer reply to your message. |
|
It's nice to see that the website is receiving some love through this year's hackathon! In regard to the following files, do we have any licence information (as per #2706):
|
Signed-off-by: Danny Colin <contact@dannycolin.com>
No information. see commit.
There's https://github.com/niochat/nio/blob/stable/Resources/AppIcon/attribution.txt in the Resources folder. However, it doesn't say to which icons it applies. Plus, there are many "chat" icons in the Noun Project. see commit.
Nothing mentioned. see commit. |
Signed-off-by: Danny Colin <contact@dannycolin.com>
|
@dannycolin are you still planning on addressing the feedback or should we take this over? |
I can update it. I wasn't sure if it was still worth based on the discussion we had that we need a better solution to classify clients. |
|
I would welcome contributions to finding better classifications but in the meantime continue with the currently established pattern and not block on this. |
Signed-off-by: Danny Colin <contact@dannycolin.com>
dannycolin
force-pushed
the
update-clients
branch
from
2b8662c to
0e32d71
Compare
|
What should we do for the client icons if there's no license information? See #3183 (comment) |
|
Quoted from a previous comment:
Good question. I asked the author (@davidar) to shed some light on this issue back in January 2026 (see this comment), and I haven't received a response as of writing this comment. I wonder if we should simply exclude content that isn't explicitly licensed. Any thoughts? |
I had the same thought. If we don't have the license to use something then obviously we cannot use it. Reaching out to authors is already going the extra mile. Given these are all obsolete, I wouldn't expect too much of a reaction either, nor is it quite as relevant as a supported client as obsoletes will be hidden by default. |
|
Quoted from a previous comment:
Upon review, (unless I'm missing something) we cannot use the Tensor or Neo logos because each project is licensed under GPL‑3.0. As for Nio, the logo’s licence is unclear, so let’s play it safe and exclude it as well. |
| title = "Neo" | ||
| template = "ecosystem/client.html" | ||
| [extra] | ||
| thumbnail = "neo.svg" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| thumbnail = "neo.svg" |
Given this comment, let's remove the logo.
| title = "Nio" | ||
| template = "ecosystem/client.html" | ||
| [extra] | ||
| thumbnail = "nio.png" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| thumbnail = "nio.png" |
Given this comment, let's remove the logo.
| title = "Tensor" | ||
| template = "ecosystem/client.html" | ||
| [extra] | ||
| thumbnail = "tensor.png" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| thumbnail = "tensor.png" |
Given this comment, let's remove the logo.
3 participants
Description
Add new clients to ecosystem/clients
Related issues
#3152
#3147
#3146
#3140
Role
Participant to the Matrix Hackathon 2026
Timeline
No timeline
Signoff
Please sign off your individual commits or whole pull request.