Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @chandra-siri, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request establishes a foundational framework for time-based performance microbenchmarks within the project. The primary goal is to enable more accurate and continuous measurement of Google Cloud Storage read throughput under various conditions, moving beyond operation-count-based benchmarks to duration-based evaluations. This enhancement will provide deeper insights into the system's sustained performance characteristics. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces time-based benchmarks for read operations. The changes include new configuration files (yaml and .py), a conftest.py for test setup, and the benchmark test logic itself. The implementation uses multiprocessing to run downloads in parallel.
My review focuses on improving the maintainability, portability, and performance of the benchmark code. Key suggestions include removing commented-out code, making benchmark names more descriptive, avoiding hardcoded values for CPU affinity to improve portability, and optimizing the download loop to reduce memory allocations and redundant calls, which is crucial for accurate performance measurement.
feat: add time based benchmarks