Conversation
|
Hi @Didayolo! As I mentioned in #2055 (comment), the Containerfile changes would be necessary to include all dependencies in the final image. It ended up taking longer to build because it builds first Containerfile.builder. Given that it is falling on pre-production, I think that we can undo such changes and discuss how to fix it on #2190, as it will also need the Containerfile changes. What do you think about it? |
Hi @pauloguilhermepp, thank you for the explanation. It is probably easy to fix as it is just package install failures. Generally it is recommended to pin the base image ( But indeed we can merge the current revert PR and keep this change for #2190. By the way it looks like #2190 really needs to be rebased as it uses the old container files names. |
Description
This PR revert the
The change in
Containerfilefrom #2055 PR are causing some troubles:We need either:
node:lts-alpine3.23)Checklist