Skip to content

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix command injection in process execution#39

Open
acebytes wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sentinel/fix-command-injection-8997230368991270982
Open

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix command injection in process execution#39
acebytes wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
sentinel/fix-command-injection-8997230368991270982

Conversation

@acebytes
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Severity: HIGH
πŸ’‘ Vulnerability: Command injection vulnerabilities existed where hardcoded string commands and string interpolations (\(tool)) were passed to the shell wrapper /bin/bash -c. If any part of these commands were ever influenced by external data, it could lead to arbitrary code execution.
🎯 Impact: Using shell wrappers allows shell metacharacters to be evaluated, increasing the attack surface. Direct process execution eliminates this entire class of vulnerabilities by preventing shell feature expansion.
πŸ”§ Fix: Refactored docker system prune and which executions to use Process with explicitly defined arrays of arguments. Output redirection 2>&1 was replicated securely by assigning the same Pipe() instance to both standardOutput and standardError.
βœ… Verification: Review the code changes. Process API is used correctly without bash -c. Note: test suite cannot run due to lack of swift toolchain in the Linux environment.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 8997230368991270982 started by @acebytes

Replaced vulnerable string-based `/bin/bash -c` executions in `dockerPrune` and `toolExists` with direct `Process` executions using `/usr/bin/env` and explicitly defined arguments, eliminating the risk of command injection.

Co-authored-by: acebytes <2820910+acebytes@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant