-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Add constants-as-variables treatment with QWERTY analysis #24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@ | ||||||
| # Constants as Variables | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| > In what world are constants so constant that they can't have the same rules as every other number? | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## The Label Problem | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| A constant is a number we agreed not to vary in a given calculation. The agreement is ours, not the number's. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ``` | ||||||
| CONSTANT = IMAGINARY = SCAFFOLD = RELATIONAL = 114 | ||||||
| ``` | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Constants are imaginary scaffolding. They hold the calculation up while we do the work — but they are not eternal. They are assigned. In a simulation, every assigned value is a parameter. Every parameter is a number. Every number follows arithmetic. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| --- | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## What "Constant" Actually Means | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| A physical constant is a measured quantity whose value we have not yet observed changing. That is a statement about our measurements, not about the number. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| The fine-structure constant α ≈ 1/137: | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ``` | ||||||
| COMPUTATION = 137 prime (the cost of universal computation) | ||||||
| ``` | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Feynman called 137 "one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics." The mystery is not that it is constant. The mystery is that we do not know why it has *this* value rather than another. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| A number whose origin we do not understand is not a constant. It is an unknown. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ``` | ||||||
| DYNAMIC = UNKNOWN = EXTENSION = 111 (= 3 × REAL = 3 × 37) | ||||||
| ``` | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| --- | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Running Constants (Quantum Field Theory) | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| The coupling "constants" in quantum field theory are not constant. They run with energy scale: | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ``` | ||||||
| α(μ) = α₀ / (1 − (α₀/3π) · ln(μ²/μ₀²)) | ||||||
| ``` | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| At low energy: α ≈ 1/137. | ||||||
| At the Z boson mass: α ≈ 1/128. | ||||||
| At the Planck scale: α → order 1. | ||||||
|
||||||
| At the Planck scale: α → order 1. | |
| At the Planck scale (∼10¹⁹ GeV), in the Standard Model α has increased but remains well below order 1 (its precise value is model-dependent). |
Copilot
AI
Feb 27, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Describing the low-energy value of a running coupling as a “fixed point of the renormalization group flow” is misleading for QED/α (β(α)≠0 in the relevant regime). If you mean “the effective value at a chosen reference scale,” consider rephrasing to avoid the fixed-point claim.
| The running constant IS the principle. What we called constant is a fixed point of the renormalization group flow, stable at low energy but free to move at high energy. The constant obeys the same differential equations as everything else. | |
| The running constant IS the principle. What we called constant is really the value of a running coupling at some chosen reference (typically low-energy) scale, where it appears nearly unchanged over the range we usually probe. The constant obeys the same differential equations as everything else. |
Copilot
AI
Feb 27, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Brans–Dicke gravity is typically formulated as a scalar–tensor theory with a varying effective gravitational coupling (G), not a varying speed of light (c). If you want an example of varying constants from the action, consider swapping this to varying G/introducing a scalar field (Brans–Dicke) or citing a varying‑c theory explicitly.
| If you let c vary, you get Brans-Dicke gravity. If you let ℏ vary, you get a modified quantum mechanics. The Lagrangian does not resist this. It is the constants — by agreement — that resist. | |
| If you promote the gravitational coupling G to a scalar field, you get Brans–Dicke–type scalar–tensor gravity. If you let c or ℏ vary, you get corresponding modified theories (for example, varying‑c models or modified quantum mechanics). The Lagrangian does not resist this. It is the constants — by agreement — that resist. |
Copilot
AI
Feb 27, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
“The Lagrangian is time-reversible” is not generally true: the Lagrangian/Euler–Lagrange framework can describe time-irreversible or T-violating dynamics depending on the terms/symmetries (e.g., explicit time dependence, dissipation models, weak-interaction CP/T violation). Consider qualifying this as applying only to time-reversal-invariant Lagrangians or to conservative systems.
| What is variable is reversible (Lagrange = reversible). The Lagrangian is time-reversible: run the equations backward and you get the same physics. Constants frozen in one direction cannot be unfrozen running backward, unless — consistently — they were always parameters. | |
| What is variable is reversible (Lagrange = reversible). For a time‑reversal‑invariant Lagrangian (as in conservative systems), the resulting equations of motion are time‑reversible: run the equations backward and you get the same physics. Constants frozen in one direction cannot be unfrozen running backward, unless — consistently — they were always parameters. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ All established constants from §1–§178, in value order. | |||||||
| | 19 | AI = TRUE | §146 | | | ||||||||
| | 22 | C = TRIT | §170 | TRIT=22 | | ||||||||
| | 23 | V = eigenvalue | §various | V key = 23 | | ||||||||
| | 24 | PURE = B = 4! | §178 | pure state | | ||||||||
| | 24 | PURE = FREE = B = 4! | §178 | pure state; free variable | | ||||||||
| | 27 | ROOT = DOT | §167 | reverse(72) | | ||||||||
| | 30 | QUTRIT = WEYL = PSI | §172, §176 | 2×G_key | | ||||||||
| | 33 | TRUST | §176 | 3×11 | | ||||||||
|
|
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ All established constants from §1–§178, in value order. | |||||||
| | 55 | SPIN = PAULI = SHIFT = OPERATOR | §168, §172 | | | ||||||||
| | 57 | HELL = POINT = GAUSS = TANH = RADIX = TMUL = FIELD | §various, §173, §177 | | | ||||||||
| | 58 | TERNARY = GROVER = LIPID | §171, §173 | | | ||||||||
| | 59 | HEAVY = CROSS | §169 | prime | | ||||||||
| | 59 | HEAVY = CROSS = FIXED | §169 | prime | | ||||||||
| | 62 | CENTER = SQUAREFREE = ENTROPY | §152, §170 | | | ||||||||
| | 63 | TRINARY = LIGHT = COLOR = O×G = VALUE | §165, §169, §172, §178 | | | ||||||||
| | 64 | WARMTH = PROTEIN = 2⁶ | §176, §175 | | | ||||||||
|
|
@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ All established constants from §1–§178, in value order. | |||||||
| | 69 | SHELL = STRUCTURE = FIELDS | §146, §177 | | | ||||||||
| | 72 | METHOD = DENSITY = reverse(27) | §167, §174, §178 | | | ||||||||
| | 74 | MEMORY = 2×REAL | §170 | | | ||||||||
| | 76 | ROTATION = CIRCUIT = FIDELITY | §160, §172, §175 | 4×TRUE | | ||||||||
| | 77 | PERIODIC = SIXTEEN | §169 | | | ||||||||
| | 75 | FROZEN = AXIOM | — | fixed constant = assumed axiom | | ||||||||
|
||||||||
| | 75 | FROZEN = AXIOM | — | fixed constant = assumed axiom | | |
| | 75 | FROZEN = AXIOM | — | fixed constant = assumed axiom | | |
| | 76 | ROTATION = CIRCUIT = FIDELITY | — | | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The running-coupling formula introduces α₀ and μ₀ without defining them. Adding a brief definition (e.g., α₀ ≡ α(μ₀), μ₀ is the reference scale) would make this equation self-contained.