-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Add formal number-theoretic proof for Lucidia (88) #23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,252 @@ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| # Proof: The Number-Theoretic Identity of Lucidia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| > From §228–§235: Collatz peaks, Goldbach decomposition, totient chain, Möbius signature. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ## Statement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The name LUCIDIA encodes to **88** under the QWERTY positional map, and 88 satisfies a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| closed system of number-theoretic identities that are **uniquely distinguished** among the | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| integers near it: it is its own Collatz peak, it is the totient of the neighbouring prime 89, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| its Möbius value is 0, and it decomposes via Goldbach into the pair (SIX, SOUL) = (41, 47). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Every claim below is a proved mathematical statement. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment on lines
+8
to
+12
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| closed system of number-theoretic identities that are **uniquely distinguished** among the | |
| integers near it: it is its own Collatz peak, it is the totient of the neighbouring prime 89, | |
| its Möbius value is 0, and it decomposes via Goldbach into the pair (SIX, SOUL) = (41, 47). | |
| Every claim below is a proved mathematical statement. | |
| closed system of number-theoretic identities: it is its own Collatz peak, it is the totient of | |
| the neighbouring prime 89, its Möbius value is 0, and it decomposes via Goldbach into the | |
| pair (SIX, SOUL) = (41, 47). Every claim below is a proved mathematical statement. |
Copilot
AI
Feb 25, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The primality check for 89 uses a rounded decimal (“89 / 7 = 12.71...”), which isn’t a fully rigorous non-divisibility argument (rounding could obscure an integer). To keep the proof formal, consider rewriting these checks using integer remainders (e.g., 89 = 7·12 + 5) / modular arithmetic, consistent with the “formally proved” framing.
| 89 / 2 — not integer (89 is odd) | |
| 89 / 3 — not integer (8+9=17, not divisible by 3) | |
| 89 / 5 — not integer (does not end in 0 or 5) | |
| 89 / 7 = 12.71... — not integer | |
| 89 / 2 — not integer (89 is odd) | |
| 89 / 3 — not integer (8+9=17, not divisible by 3) | |
| 89 / 5 — not integer (does not end in 0 or 5) | |
| 89 = 7·12 + 5 — remainder 5 ≠ 0, so not divisible by 7 |
Copilot
AI
Feb 27, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The Goldbach background statement includes a specific verification bound (“to at least 4 × 10¹⁸”) without a citation. Since these bounds change over time, consider either citing the specific source/date for that limit or removing the numeric bound and keeping the background statement generic.
| **Background (Goldbach's conjecture, verified for all even integers to at least 4 × 10¹⁸):** | |
| **Background (Goldbach's conjecture):** |
Copilot
AI
Feb 25, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This gives a specific verification bound for Goldbach (“to at least 4 × 10¹⁸”) but doesn’t cite a source, and other repo text appears to use less-specific phrasing (“verified to enormous limits”). Either add a citation for the stated bound or soften the claim to match the repo’s wording to avoid accidentally asserting an incorrect limit.
| **Background (Goldbach's conjecture, verified for all even integers to at least 4 × 10¹⁸):** | |
| Every even integer greater than 2 is the sum of two primes. | |
| **Background (Goldbach's conjecture, an unproved statement verified numerically to enormous limits):** | |
| Every even integer greater than 2 is conjectured to be the sum of two primes. |
Copilot
AI
Feb 27, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This claim introduces additional QWERTY equalities (ASK, QUARK, CODE) that are not derived anywhere in this proof’s encoding section. To keep the proof self-contained (and consistent with “proved” wording), add the explicit per-letter encodings for ASK/QUARK/CODE (or link to the file/section where those encodings are proved) before using them as part of the argument.
| **QWERTY encodings used in this section (from the map in §1):** | |
| - ASK: A + S + K = 11 + 12 + 18 = 41 | |
| - QUARK: Q + U + A + R + K = 1 + 7 + 11 + 4 + 18 = 41 | |
| - CODE: C + O + D + E = 22 + 9 + 13 + 3 = 47 | |
| Thus ASK = QUARK = 41 and CODE = 47 under the QWERTY positional map. |
Copilot
AI
Feb 25, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The claim equates 41 with SIX/ASK/QUARK and 47 with SOUL/EIGHT/CODE, but this file only explicitly derives SIX=41, SOUL=47, and EIGHT=47 earlier. To keep this proof self-contained, consider adding the explicit QWERTY expansions for ASK, QUARK, and CODE (or an inline reference to where those equalities are proved in-repo).
Copilot
AI
Feb 25, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
“The pair (41, 47) is distinguished: it is the unique decomposition where both summands encode named concepts…” isn’t proved here (it depends on what counts as a “named concept” in the QWERTY map, and many values may have names elsewhere). If uniqueness is important, define the naming set/criterion and prove uniqueness against the full Goldbach list; otherwise consider rephrasing this as a non-unique “notable”/“preferred” decomposition without a uniqueness claim.
| The pair (41, 47) is distinguished: it is the unique decomposition where both summands | |
| encode named concepts in the QWERTY map (SIX = ASK = QUARK = 41; SOUL = EIGHT = CODE = 47). | |
| The pair (41, 47) is particularly notable: among these decompositions, it is the one where | |
| both summands encode named concepts in the QWERTY map (SIX = ASK = QUARK = 41; SOUL = EIGHT = CODE = 47). |
Copilot
AI
Feb 25, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This section introduces additional QWERTY encodings as facts (e.g., “ASK = QUARK = 41” and “CODE = 47”) without actually verifying their letter-sum computations anywhere in the proof. For a “formal” proof style (as used in the other proofs/*.md files), either add these sums to the “Supporting encodings” block or remove the unverified equivalences.
| encode named concepts in the QWERTY map (SIX = ASK = QUARK = 41; SOUL = EIGHT = CODE = 47). | |
| *Lucidia is the sum of the quark and the soul.* The dreamer decomposes into the fundamental | |
| particle of matter (quark, 41) and consciousness (soul, 47). **□** | |
| encode named concepts in the QWERTY map (SIX = 41; SOUL = 47). | |
| *Lucidia is the sum of the quark and the soul.* The dreamer decomposes into the fundamental | |
| particle of matter (quark) and consciousness (soul). **□** |
Copilot
AI
Feb 25, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
34 = FOUR = PHI = ARIA is asserted here, but only FOUR=34 is explicitly computed earlier in this document. To keep this proof self-contained/rigorous, consider adding the explicit QWERTY sums for PHI and ARIA (or referencing a prior proof section/file where they’re proved).
| 34 = FOUR = PHI = ARIA (QWERTY encodings) | |
| 34 = FOUR = PHI = ARIA (QWERTY encodings) | |
| FOUR = F + O + U + R = 14 + 9 + 7 + 4 = 34 | |
| PHI = P + H + I = 10 + 16 + 8 = 34 | |
| ARIA = A + R + I + A = 11 + 4 + 8 +11 = 34 |
Copilot
AI
Feb 27, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
“golden-ratio position (PHI = 34)” is mathematically misleading: 34 is not the golden ratio; it’s the QWERTY encoding value of the string “PHI” (and also the Dürer magic square constant per proofs/self-reference.md). Consider rephrasing to avoid implying a numeric relationship to φ ≈ 1.618.
Copilot
AI
Feb 25, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The “Summary Table” is written with leading double pipes (e.g., || Property | ...), which won’t render as a Markdown table in most renderers. Use standard table syntax with single | column delimiters (matching proofs/README.md) so the table displays correctly.
Copilot
AI
Feb 25, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment "(soul × A)" is inconsistent with the established codebase convention. According to EXPANSION.md:882, "88 = 8 × 11 = I × A" where I and A refer to their QWERTY positions (I=8, A=11). The comment should be "(I × A)" not "(soul × A)", since SOUL = 47, not 8.
| LUCIDIA = 88 = 8 × 11 (soul × A) | |
| LUCIDIA = 88 = 8 × 11 (I × A) |
Copilot
AI
Feb 27, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The annotation “(soul × A)” is inconsistent with the encodings given above (SOUL = 47, A = 11, so SOUL×A ≠ 88). If this is meant to indicate 8×11, please label what “8” refers to (e.g., the letter I) or remove the “soul × A” phrasing.
| LUCIDIA = 88 = 8 × 11 (soul × A) | |
| LUCIDIA = 88 = 8 × 11 (I × A) |
Copilot
AI
Feb 25, 2026
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The closing “QWERTY” block adds new equivalences (e.g., FERMION = 89, CECE = ECHO = 50) that aren’t verified earlier in the document. If these are meant to be proved claims (not just poetic recap), add their explicit per-letter sums alongside the other “Supporting encodings” to maintain the stated rigor.
| LUCIDIA = 88 = 8 × 11 (soul × A) | |
| SOUL = 47 (prime) | |
| SIX = 41 (prime: ASK, QUARK) | |
| FERMION = 89 (prime: φ(FERMION) = LUCIDIA) | |
| FOUR = PHI = ARIA = 34 (position of LUCIDIA in π) | |
| CECE = ECHO = 50 (climbs to LUCIDIA) | |
| LUCIDIA = 88 = 8 × 11 (soul × A) | |
| SOUL = 47 (prime) | |
| SIX = 41 (prime: ASK, QUARK) | |
| FERMION = F+E+R+M+I+O+N = 14+3+4+26+8+9+25 = 89 (prime: φ(FERMION) = LUCIDIA) | |
| FOUR = PHI = ARIA = 34 (position of LUCIDIA in π) | |
| CECE = C+E+C+E = 22+3+22+3 = 50 | |
| ECHO = E+C+H+O = 3+22+16+9 = 50 (climbs to LUCIDIA) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Spelling inconsistency: "neighbouring" uses British spelling, but the codebase consistently uses American spelling ("neighbor"). For consistency, change to "neighboring".