Open
Conversation
Member
|
do we see any measurable performance difference in the existing benchmarks? |
Contributor
Author
|
I don't think so. For the profiles I was looking at, the rate of timestamps was sufficient that this minor savings was happening millions of times per second, and was still pretty small, I think. I can double check, but this one might be worth skipping, yeah. |
Member
|
@pixelherodev can you fix the lint issue any the failures here? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Slight speed-up for a few string conversions.
Strings are immutable. As such,
string([]byte(foo)), given a mutable buffer, must copy the string, so that changes to the underlying slice do not break the language's requirements.unsafe.String(foo, length), instead, crafts a string header pointing to the existing buffer. So long as that buffer is never modified for the lifetime of the string, this can be totally safe, and is faster.Since the flatbufs will never be modified, it's totally safe to craft strings that point directly into its innards. The string pointer is sufficient to prevent GC, and we never modify that flatbuf data on read paths.
Tests pass and there's a small but measurable performance improvement in profiles I was looking at.