Refine AI context files#89
Closed
ai-coding-guardrails-maxi-sandbox[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Closed
Refine AI context files#89ai-coding-guardrails-maxi-sandbox[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
ai-coding-guardrails-maxi-sandbox[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
Conversation
ai-coding-guardrails-maxi-sandbox
bot
requested a review
from JonZeolla
as a code owner
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains suggested improvements to AI context files.
Summary
CLAUDE.mdThe file is generally well-structured but has several issues: (1) a command inconsistency between
task build testandtask lint build test, (2) duplicate documentation-update instructions in two separate sections, (3) verbose code examples that repeat information already stated in prose, (4) informal/vague phrasing in the always-relevant tools instruction, and (5) a redundant Documentation Structure section. No violations of the provided security/compliance requirements were found in the file content itself.