Skip to content

fix(spec): remove built spec, use source directly#641

Merged
sidvishnoi merged 3 commits intomainfrom
spec-single-file
Feb 19, 2026
Merged

fix(spec): remove built spec, use source directly#641
sidvishnoi merged 3 commits intomainfrom
spec-single-file

Conversation

@sidvishnoi
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@sidvishnoi sidvishnoi commented Feb 2, 2026

Instead of having a pre-built spec in repo (that has to be built on each change to spec and sent along with the PR along with original ReSpec source), use ReSpec source spec directly.

In future, we'll use w3c/spec-prod to auto-build spec, but from now on, PRs will have to only modify the source document. See #585.

cc: @asurkov @lukewarlow

To reviewer: This PR is mv specification-respec.html index.html and then just added publishDate same as last build-time.

@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify Bot commented Feb 2, 2026

Deploy Preview for webmonetization-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1f136fb
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/webmonetization-preview/deploys/699569bc09a07a00080afb3c
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-641--webmonetization-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@sidvishnoi sidvishnoi changed the title fix(spec): remove built spec from repo, use source directly fix(spec): remove built spec, use source directly Feb 2, 2026
@sidvishnoi sidvishnoi added the specification Work required on specification label Feb 6, 2026
@sidvishnoi sidvishnoi merged commit 0216c31 into main Feb 19, 2026
7 checks passed
@sidvishnoi sidvishnoi deleted the spec-single-file branch February 19, 2026 12:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

specification Work required on specification

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants