OpenSPP Registry Search

[emjay0921]

Why is this change needed?

To have a new module spp_registry_search that creates an improved search UI for Registry (Individual, Group)

How was the change implemented?

Created a new module spp_registry_search

New unit tests

Unit tests executed by the author

How to test manually

Related links

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 68.34532% with 88 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 79.65%. Comparing base (9f54353) to head (ec867fe).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
spp_registry_search/models/res_partner.py	35.96%	67 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
...pp_registry_search/models/partner_search_filter.py	63.63%	11 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
spp_registry_search/models/partner_search_field.py	92.85%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
spp_registry_search/tests/test_partner_search.py	98.97%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             17.0     #859      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.83%   79.65%   -0.18%     
==========================================
  Files         805      812       +7     
  Lines       23050    23328     +278     
  Branches     2727     2764      +37     
==========================================
+ Hits        18402    18583     +181     
- Misses       3979     4065      +86     
- Partials      669      680      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
3 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
1.5% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud