[17.0] [FIX] res_partner_operating_unit: performance due to missing indexes#837
Open
ivantodorovich wants to merge 1 commit intoOCA:17.0from
Open
[17.0] [FIX] res_partner_operating_unit: performance due to missing indexes#837ivantodorovich wants to merge 1 commit intoOCA:17.0from
ivantodorovich wants to merge 1 commit intoOCA:17.0from
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are missing indexes in a Many2many relation table because of this hook.
You see, the ORM takes care of creating indexes for relation tables, but only if its the one creating the table:
The hook were manually creating the relation table and so bypassing the index creation, leading to performance issues (taking up to 15seconds to open the Contacts menu in our production db)
Looking into why the hook was created in the first place, I think it was wrongly included in one of the migrations.
You see, this code was originally proposed in
12.0, here:However, that PR was never merged. There was even a review explicitly stating the PR should not be merged:
Nonetheless, the commit was included in the migration to 14.0 -- which was never merged anyway:
Later, though, a migration to 17.0 proposal was made based on the mentioned migration to 14.0 work
res_partner_operating_unit: Migration to 17.0 #678As for the commit itself, I have to say I find no reason to make the
operating_unit_idsfield required, nor to hack their.rule. Maybe it was needed in12.0for some reason.. but not now.The proposed solution is:
required=Truein theres.partner.operating_unit_idsfield. The existingir.rulealready considers unset values.pre_init_hookthat manually.