refactor(cli)!: rename all skills and agents to consistent ce- prefix#503
refactor(cli)!: rename all skills and agents to consistent ce- prefix#503
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 79b5508dbc
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
plugins/compound-engineering/skills/ce-code-review/references/persona-catalog.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8cab52e383
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
16e4238 to
3f8a92a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 00b3c26e06
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
00b3c26 to
b27f0c0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b27f0c0c60
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
b27f0c0 to
79c262b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 79c262bf35
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
79c262b to
8b7a83f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 8b7a83fbdf
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
8b7a83f to
e08be12
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: e08be12b45
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: fd32cb77bc
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 84975ffc05
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
aafcdfc to
ec64d8f
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ec64d8f8c0
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
ec64d8f to
fe94616
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: fe94616987
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
fe94616 to
05aa0b0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 05aa0b03e6
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
05aa0b0 to
b8d7eb8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: b8d7eb8412
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
a0eb184 to
3834842
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3834842e12
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 12a79e7c6b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
- scope Kiro stale agent cleanup to compound fingerprints - clean legacy Codex workflow wrappers across pre- and post-rename formats - remove stale OpenClaw agent-* directories during upgrades - cover session-historian and slack-researcher cleanup regressions
- scope Kiro stale agent cleanup to compound fingerprints - clean legacy Codex workflow wrappers across pre- and post-rename formats - remove stale OpenClaw agent-* directories during upgrades - cover session-historian and slack-researcher cleanup regressions
08c5dfe to
76e3b7d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 76e3b7d87c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Standardize all 37 compound-engineering skills and 49 agents on a `ce-` hyphen prefix, eliminating namespace collisions with other plugins and removing the colon character that required filesystem sanitization. Key changes: - `ce:plan` → `ce-plan`, `git-commit` → `ce-commit`, etc. (29 skill directory renames + 8 frontmatter-only updates) - `adversarial-reviewer` → `ce-adversarial-reviewer`, etc. (49 agent file renames + frontmatter updates) - `ce-review` → `ce-code-review` (clearer purpose) - `ce-document-review` → `ce-doc-review` (more concise) - Agent references simplified: `compound-engineering:review:X` → `review:ce-X` - All bare agent names in prose now carry `ce-` prefix - Codex converter: remove workflow prompt wrappers (skills are directly invocable), replace `isCanonicalCodexWorkflowSkill` prefix check with direct skill copying, map deprecated `workflows:*` aliases to skill targets instead of dead prompt targets - Remove `codexPrompt` field from types/parser (no longer needed) - Path sanitization tests use non-CE examples to preserve colon coverage - New invariant test: no CE skill name contains a colon BREAKING CHANGE: All skill and agent names changed. `/ce:plan` is now `/ce-plan`, `/ce:review` is now `/ce-code-review`, agent references use `<category>:ce-<name>` format instead of `compound-engineering:<category>:<name>`. Closes #337 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…mizer skill The extract-commands-normalize test imported from the old `claude-permissions-optimizer` directory path. Update to `ce-claude-permissions-optimizer` to match the rename. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
… mapping, OpenCode 2-segment rewrite - Update ce-work and ce-work-beta to reference `ce-commit-push-pr` and `ce-commit` instead of old `git-commit-push-pr`/`git-commit` names - Add WORKFLOW_ALIAS_OVERRIDES map so `workflows:review` correctly resolves to `ce-code-review` instead of non-existent `ce-review` - Add 2-segment `category:ce-agent` rewrite to OpenCode transform so refs like `review:ce-correctness-reviewer` flatten to `ce-correctness-reviewer` Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…dled plugin uses ce- prefix The fixture's agent-one.md has `name: repo-research-analyst` (no ce- prefix), so fixture-based tests check for `repo-research-analyst.md`. The bundled plugin test checks for `ce-repo-research-analyst.md`. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Users who previously ran `install --to codex` (or any target) have old skill dirs (git-commit/, setup/, document-review/) and agent files (adversarial-reviewer.md, etc.) that would coexist with the new ce-* names after re-installing. This causes duplicate/conflicting entries at runtime. Add a one-time legacy cleanup module that removes known stale paths before writing new content. Wired into all 10 target writers. Handles: - 31 stale skill dirs (29 renamed + ce-review, ce-document-review) - 49 stale agent files/dirs (all agents gained ce- prefix) - 8 stale Codex prompt wrappers (removed in this release) Cleanup is idempotent and marked with TODO(cleanup) for removal after the v3 transition window. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Covers skill dir removal, agent file removal (flat .md, .agent.md, and directory formats), prompt wrapper removal, preservation of non-stale files, and idempotency. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Make stale skill and agent removal fingerprint-aware so shared install roots keep user-owned files with overlapping names. Also move Qwen cleanup ahead of agent writes and clean Pi legacy agent directories from skills/ instead of prompts, with regression tests for both cases.
Remove pre-rename agent skill directories from Gemini installs before writing generated skills so stale unprefixed agents do not remain discoverable after the ce- rename.
Teach stale cleanup about the historical setup skill description and Kiro's legacy JSON/prompt agent formats so rename cleanup still works after later wording changes and on Kiro installs.
Align the rebased session history agent with the plugin's ce- naming convention and update the README plus skill dispatch references to match.
- scope Kiro stale agent cleanup to compound fingerprints - clean legacy Codex workflow wrappers across pre- and post-rename formats - remove stale OpenClaw agent-* directories during upgrades - cover session-historian and slack-researcher cleanup regressions
Update the live skill dispatch to use research:ce-slack-researcher so the command resolves the renamed agent at runtime.
4d42dd2 to
b130de2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
The subagent contract still tells reviewers to write full JSON artifacts under .context/compound-engineering/ce-review/{run_id}/..., but the renamed workflow now documents and emits artifact locations under ce-code-review (for example the Stage 4 artifact directory and headless Artifact: output). In headless/autofix runs this path split means the orchestrator can miss the reviewer artifact files it expects, so Why/Evidence enrichment and downstream artifact references become inconsistent or empty. Please make the artifact directory name consistent with ce-code-review across the review skill/template.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
Why
Generic skill names (
setup,plan,review) collide when users install multiple Claude Code plugins. Our naming was inconsistent: 8 workflow skills usedce:colon prefix, 33 others had no prefix, and agent references used verbose 3-segment format (compound-engineering:review:adversarial-reviewer). The colon also required filesystem sanitization on Windows.This PR standardizes everything on
ce-hyphen prefix — skills, agents, and cross-references.What changed
Skill renames (37 skills):
ce:plan→ce-plan(colon to hyphen, 8 skills)git-commit→ce-commit,setup→ce-setup, etc. (prefix added, 24 skills)git-worktree→ce-worktree,git-commit-push-pr→ce-commit-push-pr(git- prefix replaced, 4 skills)report-bug-ce→ce-report-bug(normalized, 1 skill)ce-review→ce-code-review,ce-document-review→ce-doc-reviewagent-browser,rclone(upstream),lfg,slfg(memorable names)Agent renames (49 agents):
ce-prefix within their category dirs:adversarial-reviewer.md→ce-adversarial-reviewer.mdcompound-engineering:review:adversarial-reviewer→review:ce-adversarial-reviewerlearnings-researcher) →ce-learnings-researcherCodex converter simplification:
workflows:*aliases now map to skill targets instead of dead prompt targetscodexPromptfield from types/parser (no longer needed)Tests:
ce:brainstormtoother:skillto preserve colon coverageHow to review
This is a large but mechanical change (180 files). Suggested approach:
src/converters/claude-to-codex.ts) — the only real logic change. The prompt wrapper removal and alias-to-skill-target mapping are the interesting bits.lfg/SKILL.mdandslfg/SKILL.md— these orchestrate the full workflow chain and are where broken refs would be most visible.git mvoperations and frontmatter updates are mechanical. The test suite andrelease:validateconfirm consistency.Test plan
bun test— 572 pass (2 pre-existing network failures unrelated to this change)bun run release:validate— 49 agents, 41 skills, 0 MCP servers/ce:,compound-engineering:category:agent, or bare agent names in active codeagent-browser,rclone,lfg,slfgcorrectly excluded from renamingPost-Deploy Monitoring & Validation
No runtime deployment — plugin content and CLI converter change. After marketplace publish:
/ce-plan,/ce-code-review,/ce-workresolve in a fresh Claude Code sessionce-names and no prompt wrappersBREAKING CHANGE: All skill and agent names changed.
/ce:plan→/ce-plan,/ce:review→/ce-code-review, agent refs use<category>:ce-<name>format.Closes #337
🤖 Generated with Claude Code · Compound Engineered · Model:
claude-opus-4-6· Harness:claude-code