Display a list of former members on the people page

[albangaignard]

The idea is to add a boolean field for each people.

[sneumann]

Hi, cool, that was quick!
just one brief comment: why Boolean ?
One could have active, alumni,dontshow, somethingelse
Controlling where/if a person is shown.
Yours, Steffen

[ivanmicetic]

Hi, cool, that was quick! just one brief comment: why Boolean ? One could have active, alumni,dontshow, somethingelse Controlling where/if a person is shown. Yours, Steffen

You're right, we can implement the state of the person as an array of values and check for those. The priority now is to go through the list of people and tag them accordingly...

[sneumann]

Using the one-liner for U in $(grep github_username *.md | cut -d : -f 3 | sort | uniq | tr -d " " ) ; do echo -n "$U " ; HEAD https://github.com/$U | head -1 ; done
I found christopherchild 404 Not Found has renamed/pulled the GitHub repo, or that is a typo.
Yours, Steffen

[ljgarcia]

@albangaignard @ivanmicetic will we keep the boolean or will we go for an enumeration of possible states?

[ljgarcia]

Using the one-liner for U in $(grep github_username *.md | cut -d : -f 3 | sort | uniq | tr -d " " ) ; do echo -n "$U " ; HEAD https://github.com/$U | head -1 ; done I found christopherchild 404 Not Found has renamed/pulled the GitHub repo, or that is a typo. Yours, Steffen

@sneumann I am not sure I understand where the error is. ChrisChild is how Chris Child is recorded in the Bioschemas GitHub pages while christopherchild is the corresponding GitHub username (which is included in the person profile page at https://bioschemas.org/people/ChrisChild)

[sneumann]

https://github.com/christopherchild gives a 404, I think that user is gone or miss-spelled:
https://github.com/search?q=christopherchild&type=users

[ljgarcia]

@albangaignard @ivanmicetic any news on this draft?

[ljgarcia]

@albangaignard @ivanmicetic any news on this draft?

[ljgarcia]

@albangaignard I saw that we already have former members for the Training group. But this PR is still in draft. Is it still valid? Was it sorted out with another PR? Or is the Training group a manual approach that this PR aim to automate for any group?