Skip to content

Conversation

@ehellbar
Copy link
Collaborator

@ehellbar ehellbar commented Jan 29, 2026

No description provided.

@ehellbar ehellbar requested a review from a team as a code owner January 29, 2026 14:56
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES:
To request your PR to be included in production software, please add the corresponding labels called "async-" to your PR. Add the labels directly (if you have the permissions) or add a comment of the form (note that labels are separated by a ",")

+async-label <label1>, <label2>, !<label3> ...

This will add <label1> and <label2> and removes <label3>.

The following labels are available
async-2023-pbpb-apass4
async-2023-pp-apass4
async-2024-pp-apass1
async-2022-pp-apass7
async-2024-pp-cpass0
async-2024-PbPb-apass1
async-2024-ppRef-apass1
async-2024-PbPb-apass2
async-2023-PbPb-apass5

@ehellbar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

for raw-proxies, there is an additional non-DPL channel in state.inputChannelInfos, which is not in spec.inputChannels though. Since the loop is over state.inputChannelInfos, the signpost accessed an invalid or random address when getting the spec.inputChannels[sci].name for the non-DPL channel. On mac, this somehow always worked out (although with wrong string, of course), while on slc9 it segfaulted.

@ktf
Copy link
Member

ktf commented Jan 29, 2026

Ok. I should really integrate the raw fairmq channels in the model, though...

@ktf ktf merged commit fd54f4a into AliceO2Group:dev Jan 30, 2026
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants