Add CodeRabbit configuration file (.coderabbit.yaml)#20
Add CodeRabbit configuration file (.coderabbit.yaml)#20anshulchikhale30-p wants to merge 1 commit intoAOSSIE-Org:mainfrom
Conversation
Added configuration for CodeRabbit integration, enabling auto-reviews, issue enrichment, and various review instructions for multiple file types.
|
Warning Ignoring CodeRabbit configuration file changes. For security, only the configuration from the base branch is applied for open source repositories. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughIntroduces a new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.coderabbit.yaml (2)
217-217: Redundant single-element brace group in glob pattern.
"**/*.{py}"is equivalent to"**/*.py". The braces only add noise. Same issue at Line 260 with"**/*.test.{sol}".🔧 Proposed fix
- - path: "**/*.{py}" + - path: "**/*.py"- - path: "**/*.test.{sol}" + - path: "**/*.test.sol"🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.coderabbit.yaml at line 217, Replace redundant single-element brace groups in the glob patterns: change the pattern "**/*.{py}" to "**/*.py" and similarly change "**/*.test.{sol}" to "**/*.test.sol" so the braces are removed and the glob syntax is simplified; update the corresponding entries in the YAML where these exact patterns appear.
170-197: NextJS (web) and React Native/Expo (mobile) instructions are mixed in the same block.The
**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}pattern covers all TypeScript/JavaScript files, but the instructions combine NextJS server/client patterns ("use client", static generation, API routes) with React Native/Expo-specific guidance (expo-secure-store, deep linking, PWA). These are distinct platforms with conflicting constraints (e.g.,"use client"is irrelevant in an Expo app, andexpo-secure-storeis unavailable in a NextJS web context). This will produce false-positive review comments for whichever platform isn't in use.Consider splitting into separate
path_instructionsentries scoped to the actual directories that correspond to each platform (e.g.,apps/web/**/*.{ts,tsx}vs.apps/mobile/**/*.{ts,tsx}), or remove instructions that don't apply to this project's actual stack.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 170 - 197, The instructions block applies both to web and mobile and uses the broad glob "**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}", causing platform-specific checks to fire incorrectly; fix this by splitting the block into separate path_instructions entries scoped to each platform (e.g., a Next.js scope like apps/web/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} and a mobile/Expo scope like apps/mobile/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}), move NextJS-only rules ("use client", API routes, static generation) into the Next.js entry and Expo-specific rules (expo-secure-store, deep linking) into the mobile entry, and remove or conditionally apply any checks that are not relevant to the project's actual stack so reviewers don’t get false positives.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 67-68: The comment above the request_changes_workflow setting is
misleading: the schema flag request_changes_workflow: true causes CodeRabbit to
file formal "Request Changes" reviews that can block merges, not "just leave
comments"; either change the boolean to false to make the tool comment-only, or
update the comment text to accurately describe the blocking behavior when
request_changes_workflow is true—locate the request_changes_workflow entry and
adjust the value or the inline comment accordingly.
- Around line 153-165: Replace the invalid reviews.instructions key with
reviews.path_instructions and add a path: "**/*" entry to make the block global
(use reviews.path_instructions with path: "**/*"); also change the YAML
folded-strip scalar ">-" to a literal block "|" for the instruction text so line
breaks and bullet formatting are preserved, and ensure the instruction text is
properly indented under the path_instructions entry.
---
Nitpick comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Line 217: Replace redundant single-element brace groups in the glob patterns:
change the pattern "**/*.{py}" to "**/*.py" and similarly change
"**/*.test.{sol}" to "**/*.test.sol" so the braces are removed and the glob
syntax is simplified; update the corresponding entries in the YAML where these
exact patterns appear.
- Around line 170-197: The instructions block applies both to web and mobile and
uses the broad glob "**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}", causing platform-specific checks to
fire incorrectly; fix this by splitting the block into separate
path_instructions entries scoped to each platform (e.g., a Next.js scope like
apps/web/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx} and a mobile/Expo scope like
apps/mobile/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}), move NextJS-only rules ("use client", API
routes, static generation) into the Next.js entry and Expo-specific rules
(expo-secure-store, deep linking) into the mobile entry, and remove or
conditionally apply any checks that are not relevant to the project's actual
stack so reviewers don’t get false positives.
| # Automatically request changes on the PR (just leave comments) | ||
| request_changes_workflow: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Misleading comment — request_changes_workflow: true does the opposite of "just leave comments".
The comment reads # Automatically request changes on the PR (just leave comments), but per the schema, request_changes_workflow: true means CodeRabbit will formally use GitHub's Request Changes review status and will only approve the PR once its comments are resolved and all pre-merge checks pass. This can actively block merges. If the intent is to only post comments without blocking, set this to false (the default).
🔧 If the intent is comment-only (no blocking)
- # Automatically request changes on the PR (just leave comments)
- request_changes_workflow: true
+ # Only leave comments; do not block the PR with a Request Changes review status
+ request_changes_workflow: false📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Automatically request changes on the PR (just leave comments) | |
| request_changes_workflow: true | |
| # Only leave comments; do not block the PR with a Request Changes review status | |
| request_changes_workflow: false |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 67 - 68, The comment above the
request_changes_workflow setting is misleading: the schema flag
request_changes_workflow: true causes CodeRabbit to file formal "Request
Changes" reviews that can block merges, not "just leave comments"; either change
the boolean to false to make the tool comment-only, or update the comment text
to accurately describe the blocking behavior when request_changes_workflow is
true—locate the request_changes_workflow entry and adjust the value or the
inline comment accordingly.
| instructions: >- | ||
| - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes | ||
| - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices | ||
| - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests | ||
| - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives | ||
| - Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed | ||
| - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code | ||
| - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible | ||
| - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec | ||
| - Look for code duplication | ||
| - Suggest code completions when: | ||
| - seeing a TODO comment | ||
| - seeing a FIXME comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
CodeRabbit .coderabbit.yaml schema reviews.instructions field documentation
💡 Result:
reviews.instructions is not a valid field in the current CodeRabbit .coderabbit.yaml schema (schema v2). The reviews object in schema.v2.json does not define an instructions property. [1]
Use these instead:
- Path-scoped review instructions:
reviews.path_instructions(array of{ path, instructions }). This is the schema-supported way to give “review instructions” for specific files/globs. [1][2] - Global tone guidance:
tone_instructions(top-level string) to steer overall voice/style for reviews and chat. [1][2]
References:
- Auto-generated config reference (updated 2026-02-11): see “Reviews →
path_instructions”. [2] - JSON Schema (authoritative):
https://www.coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json. [1]
Sources:
[1] https://www.coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
[2] https://docs.coderabbit.ai/reference/configuration
reviews.instructions is not a valid schema field and will be silently ignored — use path_instructions with "**/*" instead.
Two issues compound here:
-
Invalid field: The
reviewsobject in the CodeRabbit schema (v2) does not define aninstructionsproperty. The only supported mechanism for review instructions isreviews.path_instructionswith path-scoped blocks. For truly global instructions, usepath: "**/*"as the glob pattern. -
Wrong YAML scalar:
>-(folded-strip scalar) converts every newline to a space, collapsing the bullet-point list into one unreadable string. The|(literal) block scalar is required to preserve line breaks.
🔧 Proposed fix
- # Review instructions that apply to all files
- instructions: >-
- - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes
- - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices
- - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests
- - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives
- - Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed
- - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code
- - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible
- - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec
- - Look for code duplication
- - Suggest code completions when:
- - seeing a TODO comment
- - seeing a FIXME comment
+ # Review instructions that apply to all files
path_instructions:
+ - path: "**/*"
+ instructions: |
+ - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes
+ - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices
+ - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests
+ - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives
+ - Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed
+ - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code
+ - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible
+ - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec
+ - Look for code duplication
+ - Suggest code completions when:
+ - seeing a TODO comment
+ - seeing a FIXME comment🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 153 - 165, Replace the invalid
reviews.instructions key with reviews.path_instructions and add a path: "**/*"
entry to make the block global (use reviews.path_instructions with path:
"**/*"); also change the YAML folded-strip scalar ">-" to a literal block "|"
for the instruction text so line breaks and bullet formatting are preserved, and
ensure the instruction text is properly indented under the path_instructions
entry.
Summary
This PR adds the standardized .coderabbit.yaml configuration file from the AOSSIE Template Repository.
Purpose
Summary by CodeRabbit