Add CodeRabbit AI code review configuration#18
Add CodeRabbit AI code review configuration#18YadavAkhileshh wants to merge 1 commit intoAOSSIE-Org:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Warning Ignoring CodeRabbit configuration file changes. For security, only the configuration from the base branch is applied for open source repositories. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.coderabbit.yaml (4)
199-199:**/*.{py}is an unusual single-element brace expansion; prefer**/*.py.While most glob engines (including minimatch used by CodeRabbit) handle
{py}correctly as a single-option brace, it is non-idiomatic and may not be supported by all implementations. Each path instruction's path is a glob pattern using minimatch syntax.🛠️ Proposed fix
- - path: "**/*.{py}" + - path: "**/*.py"🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.coderabbit.yaml at line 199, Replace the non-idiomatic glob pattern "**/*.{py}" with the standard "**/*.py" in the configuration so the path uses a normal file extension glob; locate the entry that currently contains the string "**/*.{py}" and update it to "**/*.py" to ensure broader compatibility with minimatch-compatible glob engines.
7-8:early_access: truecontradicts its own comment and enables potentially unstable features.The comment says "currently not using any specific early_access features", yet the flag is set to
true.early_accessenables experimental features and its default isfalse. Enabling it without a specific reason may introduce unexpected behavior. Either remove the misleading comment and document why it istrue, or set it tofalse.🛠️ Proposed fix
-# Enable experimental features (currently not using any specific early_access features) -early_access: true +# Enable experimental features (set to true only if a specific early_access feature is needed) +early_access: false🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 7 - 8, The configuration sets early_access: true while the comment says "currently not using any specific early_access features", creating a contradiction and enabling experimental behavior; either set early_access to false to match the comment or update the comment to explain why early_access: true is required and list the specific experimental features being used—change the early_access boolean or revise the comment accordingly (edit the early_access key and the adjacent comment in .coderabbit.yaml).
103-117: Several language-specific linters enabled here are irrelevant to OrgExplorer's TypeScript/Web stack.
swiftlint(Swift),phpstan(PHP),golangci-lint(Go), anddetekt(Kotlin) will never run on this codebase because there are no matching source files. While they won't cause harm, explicitly disabling them reduces noise and makes the intended toolchain clearer.hadolint(Dockerfile) may also be unnecessary unless the project ships Docker images.🛠️ Proposed cleanup
- hadolint: - enabled: true - swiftlint: - enabled: true - phpstan: - enabled: true - level: default - golangci-lint: - enabled: true + hadolint: + enabled: false # No Dockerfiles in this web project + swiftlint: + enabled: false # Swift not used + phpstan: + enabled: false # PHP not used + golangci-lint: + enabled: false # Go not used ... - detekt: - enabled: true + detekt: + enabled: false # Kotlin not used🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 103 - 117, Disable or remove irrelevant language-specific linters to reduce noise: set enabled: false (or remove the entries) for swiftlint, phpstan, golangci-lint, and detekt since this is a TypeScript/Web repo, and consider disabling hadolint unless you actually build Docker images; update the corresponding top-level keys (swiftlint, phpstan, golangci-lint, detekt, hadolint) in the CI config so only applicable tools remain enabled.
99-100: Bothbiomeandeslintare enabled, which will produce overlapping lint results on TypeScript/JavaScript files.Biome is designed as an ESLint + Prettier replacement for web projects. Enabling both on a TypeScript codebase will result in duplicate or conflicting lint comments. Consider keeping only the one already configured in the project, or explicitly disabling the other.
🛠️ Proposed fix (example: keep Biome, disable ESLint)
biome: enabled: true ... - eslint: - enabled: true + eslint: + enabled: false # Disabled: Biome covers JS/TS linting and formattingAlso applies to: 118-119
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 99 - 100, The configuration currently enables both biome and eslint (the YAML keys "biome: enabled: true" and "eslint: enabled: true"), causing overlapping linting on TypeScript/JavaScript files; decide which tool to keep and disable the other by setting its "enabled" flag to false (e.g., keep biome and set eslint.enabled: false or vice versa) and remove or update any duplicate entries elsewhere (the other occurrence of these keys) to avoid conflicting lint results.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 170-172: The security checklist incorrectly recommends the
mobile-only package "expo-secure-store" for a TypeScript/Web project; update the
"Security" entry to remove "expo-secure-store" and replace it with
web-appropriate alternatives such as using the Web Crypto API for client-side
encryption, secure HTTP-only cookies or same-site cookies for session tokens,
encrypted storage libraries like localForage with encryption, and recommending
server-side secret management (e.g., Vault or cloud KMS) for sensitive keys;
ensure the YAML "Security" section text no longer references "expo-secure-store"
and instead lists these web-focused options.
- Around line 67-68: The setting request_changes_workflow: true combined with
profile: assertive causes CodeRabbit to formally request changes and block
merges (not "just leave comments"); update the config by either setting
request_changes_workflow to false to avoid blocking PR merges while you evaluate
assertive feedback, or if you intend to block merges, change the inline comment
to accurately state that request_changes_workflow with profile: assertive will
create formal "request changes" reviews that must be resolved; reference the two
identifiers request_changes_workflow and profile: assertive when making the
change.
- Around line 154-156: The NextJS rules currently unconditionally require "use
client" and client-only features (symbols: NextJS:, the checklist lines "Ensure
that \"use client\" is being used" and "Ensure that only features that allow
pure client-side rendering are used"), which will falsely flag valid App Router
server components; update the rule logic so these checks only run for files that
are explicitly client components or in a client-only directory: change the
matcher to target files containing the literal "use client" or files in a
configured client-only path (or add a project type flag for SPA vs App Router),
and remove the blanket enforcement so server components are exempt from these
NextJS checks.
- Around line 135-147: The top-level "instructions" block is not recognized by
the schema; move its content into a catch-all path_instructions entry so the
rules are applied—create or update path_instructions to include an item with
path set to a glob like "**/*" and copy the current instructions text into that
item's instructions field, then remove the obsolete top-level "instructions"
key; ensure the new structure uses the exact key name path_instructions and
preserves all bullets (spelling, tests, copyright checks, comment guidance,
TODO/FIXME suggestions).
---
Nitpick comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Line 199: Replace the non-idiomatic glob pattern "**/*.{py}" with the standard
"**/*.py" in the configuration so the path uses a normal file extension glob;
locate the entry that currently contains the string "**/*.{py}" and update it to
"**/*.py" to ensure broader compatibility with minimatch-compatible glob
engines.
- Around line 7-8: The configuration sets early_access: true while the comment
says "currently not using any specific early_access features", creating a
contradiction and enabling experimental behavior; either set early_access to
false to match the comment or update the comment to explain why early_access:
true is required and list the specific experimental features being used—change
the early_access boolean or revise the comment accordingly (edit the
early_access key and the adjacent comment in .coderabbit.yaml).
- Around line 103-117: Disable or remove irrelevant language-specific linters to
reduce noise: set enabled: false (or remove the entries) for swiftlint, phpstan,
golangci-lint, and detekt since this is a TypeScript/Web repo, and consider
disabling hadolint unless you actually build Docker images; update the
corresponding top-level keys (swiftlint, phpstan, golangci-lint, detekt,
hadolint) in the CI config so only applicable tools remain enabled.
- Around line 99-100: The configuration currently enables both biome and eslint
(the YAML keys "biome: enabled: true" and "eslint: enabled: true"), causing
overlapping linting on TypeScript/JavaScript files; decide which tool to keep
and disable the other by setting its "enabled" flag to false (e.g., keep biome
and set eslint.enabled: false or vice versa) and remove or update any duplicate
entries elsewhere (the other occurrence of these keys) to avoid conflicting lint
results.
| # Automatically request changes on the PR (just leave comments) | ||
| request_changes_workflow: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
request_changes_workflow: true with assertive profile will block PR merges, not "just leave comments".
The inline comment on Line 67 says # Automatically request changes on the PR (just leave comments), which is incorrect. Per the official schema: "Approve the review once CodeRabbit's comments are resolved and no pre-merge checks are in an error state. Note: In GitLab, all discussions must be resolved." The default is false.
With profile: assertive (Line 34), this combination means every nitpicky comment CodeRabbit generates will formally block the PR from merging until resolved. This is a significant process change and likely unintentional given the misleading comment. Consider starting with request_changes_workflow: false until the team is comfortable with assertive-level feedback volume.
🛠️ Proposed fix
- # Automatically request changes on the PR (just leave comments)
- request_changes_workflow: true
+ # When enabled, CodeRabbit formally requests changes and blocks merge until all comments are resolved.
+ # Start with false; enable once the team is comfortable with assertive review volume.
+ request_changes_workflow: false📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| # Automatically request changes on the PR (just leave comments) | |
| request_changes_workflow: true | |
| # When enabled, CodeRabbit formally requests changes and blocks merge until all comments are resolved. | |
| # Start with false; enable once the team is comfortable with assertive review volume. | |
| request_changes_workflow: false |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 67 - 68, The setting request_changes_workflow:
true combined with profile: assertive causes CodeRabbit to formally request
changes and block merges (not "just leave comments"); update the config by
either setting request_changes_workflow to false to avoid blocking PR merges
while you evaluate assertive feedback, or if you intend to block merges, change
the inline comment to accurately state that request_changes_workflow with
profile: assertive will create formal "request changes" reviews that must be
resolved; reference the two identifiers request_changes_workflow and profile:
assertive when making the change.
| instructions: >- | ||
| - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes | ||
| - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices | ||
| - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests | ||
| - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives | ||
| - Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed | ||
| - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code | ||
| - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible | ||
| - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec | ||
| - Look for code duplication | ||
| - Suggest code completions when: | ||
| - seeing a TODO comment | ||
| - seeing a FIXME comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
CodeRabbit reviews.instructions YAML configuration field schema
💡 Result:
reviews.instructions is not a valid field in CodeRabbit’s .coderabbit.yaml schema v2 (it does not exist under reviews:). (coderabbit.ai)
If you’re looking for “review instructions”, the schema provides these instruction-like fields instead:
-
Global tone instructions
tone_instructions:string,maxLength: 250, default""(coderabbit.ai)
-
PR title generation instructions
reviews.auto_title_instructions:string, default""(coderabbit.ai)
-
High-level summary instructions
reviews.high_level_summary_instructions:string, default""(coderabbit.ai)
-
Path-scoped review instructions (closest match to “reviews.instructions”)
reviews.path_instructions:arrayof objects with:path:string(required)instructions:string,maxLength: 20000(required) (coderabbit.ai)
-
Label suggestion instructions
reviews.labeling_instructions:arrayof objects with:label:string(required)instructions:string,maxLength: 3000(required) (coderabbit.ai)
Citations:
- 1: https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
- 2: https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
- 3: https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
- 4: https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
- 5: https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
- 6: https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Move instructions into path_instructions with a catch-all pattern to make review instructions active.
reviews.instructions is not a valid schema field and will be silently ignored. CodeRabbit's official schema v2 defines instructions through path_instructions (array with path and instructions keys) and labeling_instructions, not as a top-level reviews.instructions field. As a result, all global instructions here—spelling checks, test coverage, copyright year enforcement, etc.—will have no effect.
Migrate these instructions to a catch-all path_instructions entry:
🛠️ Proposed fix
- # Review instructions that apply to all files
- instructions: >-
- - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes
- - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices
- - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests
- - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives
- - Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed
- - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code
- - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible
- - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec
- - Look for code duplication
- - Suggest code completions when:
- - seeing a TODO comment
- - seeing a FIXME comment
# Custom review instructions for specific file patterns
path_instructions:
+ - path: "**/*"
+ instructions: |
+ - Verify that documentation and comments are free of spelling mistakes
+ - Ensure that test code is automated, comprehensive, and follows testing best practices
+ - Verify that all critical functionality is covered by tests
+ - Confirm that the code meets the project's requirements and objectives
+ - Confirm that copyright years are up-to date whenever a file is changed
+ - Point out redundant obvious comments that do not add clarity to the code
+ - Ensure that comments are concise and suggest more concise comment statements if possible
+ - Discourage usage of verbose comment styles such as NatSpec
+ - Look for code duplication
+ - Suggest code completions when seeing a TODO or FIXME comment🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 135 - 147, The top-level "instructions" block
is not recognized by the schema; move its content into a catch-all
path_instructions entry so the rules are applied—create or update
path_instructions to include an item with path set to a glob like "**/*" and
copy the current instructions text into that item's instructions field, then
remove the obsolete top-level "instructions" key; ensure the new structure uses
the exact key name path_instructions and preserves all bullets (spelling, tests,
copyright checks, comment guidance, TODO/FIXME suggestions).
| NextJS: | ||
| - Ensure that "use client" is being used | ||
| - Ensure that only features that allow pure client-side rendering are used |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"Ensure that 'use client' is being used" will trigger incorrect review comments for Next.js server components.
These two instructions conflict directly with Next.js App Router's server-first model:
- "Ensure that 'use client' is being used" — Server components (the default in App Router) must NOT have
'use client'. Requiring it on every.ts/.tsxfile would flag all valid server-side code as violations. - "Ensure that only features that allow pure client-side rendering are used" — This contradicts the entire point of Next.js, which is built around SSR, React Server Components, and API routes.
These instructions appear to have been copied from a React Native / pure SPA configuration. They will generate a high volume of incorrect review comments on valid Next.js server-side code.
🛠️ Proposed fix
NextJS:
- - Ensure that "use client" is being used
- - Ensure that only features that allow pure client-side rendering are used
- - NextJS best practices (including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods) are used.
+ - Use "use client" only for components that require browser APIs or React hooks (useState, useEffect, etc.)
+ - Prefer React Server Components (RSC) by default; avoid "use client" in components that do not need client interactivity
+ - Follow Next.js App Router best practices (file structure, layouts, loading.tsx, error.tsx, API route handlers, server actions)
+ - Avoid anti-patterns such as fetching data in client components when server components or Route Handlers are more appropriate🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 154 - 156, The NextJS rules currently
unconditionally require "use client" and client-only features (symbols: NextJS:,
the checklist lines "Ensure that \"use client\" is being used" and "Ensure that
only features that allow pure client-side rendering are used"), which will
falsely flag valid App Router server components; update the rule logic so these
checks only run for files that are explicitly client components or in a
client-only directory: change the matcher to target files containing the literal
"use client" or files in a configured client-only path (or add a project type
flag for SPA vs App Router), and remove the blanket enforcement so server
components are exempt from these NextJS checks.
| Security: | ||
| - No exposed API keys or sensitive data | ||
| - Use expo-secure-store for sensitive storage |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
expo-secure-store is a React Native/Expo library — irrelevant for a web project.
expo-secure-store is a mobile-only Expo SDK package for securely storing key-value pairs on iOS/Android devices. OrgExplorer is a TypeScript/Web project, so recommending this library will generate incorrect review comments.
🛠️ Proposed fix: replace with web-appropriate alternatives
- - Use expo-secure-store for sensitive storage
+ - Avoid storing sensitive data in localStorage or sessionStorage; prefer HttpOnly cookies or server-side session management
+ - Do not persist tokens or credentials in client-accessible storage🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In @.coderabbit.yaml around lines 170 - 172, The security checklist incorrectly
recommends the mobile-only package "expo-secure-store" for a TypeScript/Web
project; update the "Security" entry to remove "expo-secure-store" and replace
it with web-appropriate alternatives such as using the Web Crypto API for
client-side encryption, secure HTTP-only cookies or same-site cookies for
session tokens, encrypted storage libraries like localForage with encryption,
and recommending server-side secret management (e.g., Vault or cloud KMS) for
sensitive keys; ensure the YAML "Security" section text no longer references
"expo-secure-store" and instead lists these web-focused options.
1 participant
Summary
This PR adds the CodeRabbit AI code review configuration file (
.coderabbit.yaml) to the repository.What is CodeRabbit?
CodeRabbit is an AI-powered code review tool that automatically reviews pull requests, provides high-level summaries of changes, generates sequence diagrams, and suggests improvements to catch bugs early.
Configuration Details
.coderabbit.yaml(repository root)Tech-Specific Adjustments
Benefits
Checklist
cc: Mentors please review and merge when ready.
Summary by CodeRabbit