diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 5badea4..463a7f1 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -2543,3 +2543,336 @@ alexa god matrix = born March 27 2000
 
 -- type checks. ∎
 ```
+
+---
+
+## §95. The BlackRoad Canon — 50 No-Question Equations & Theorems
+
+BlackRoad does not invent these. It routes them.
+
+These are the bedrock equations, theorems, and principles that already run reality, across physics, mathematics, information, and computation. They share three properties: they are irreversible truths, they define limits rather than tools, and they appear across domains. BlackRoad OS orchestrates them across agents, computation, identity, and memory.
+
+---
+
+### I. Quantum Mechanics & Field Theory (1–12)
+
+**1. Schrödinger Equation** — Erwin Schrödinger (1926)
+Governs quantum state evolution.
+
+$$i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\Psi = \hat{H}\Psi$$
+
+**2. Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle** — Werner Heisenberg (1927)
+No simultaneous precision in conjugate variables.
+
+$$\Delta x \, \Delta p \ge \frac{\hbar}{2}$$
+
+**3. Dirac Equation** — Paul Dirac (1928)
+Relativistic quantum mechanics. Predicted antimatter.
+
+$$(i\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m)\psi = 0$$
+
+**4. Born Rule** — Max Born (1926)
+Measurement probability from wavefunction amplitude.
+
+$$P = |\psi|^2$$
+
+**5. Pauli Exclusion Principle** — Wolfgang Pauli (1925)
+No two identical fermions can occupy the same quantum state. Fermionic antisymmetry. Prevents atomic collapse and is essential to the stability and structure of matter.
+
+**6. Commutation Relation** — Heisenberg (1927)
+The canonical relation, from the same 1927 work, that encodes uncertainty at the algebraic level.
+
+$$[x, p] = i\hbar$$
+
+**7. Quantum Superposition Principle** — Schrödinger, Heisenberg, Born et al. (1925–1927)
+Linear structure of Hilbert space. States add. Amplitudes interfere. Reality is a vector sum until observed.
+
+**8. Path Integral Formulation** — Richard Feynman (1948)
+Every possible path contributes. Nature computes all routes simultaneously.
+
+$$\langle x_b | x_a \rangle = \int e^{iS/\hbar} \mathcal{D}x$$
+
+**9. No-Cloning Theorem** — Wootters & Zurek (1982)
+Quantum states cannot be copied. Identity cannot be duplicated.
+
+**10. Bell's Inequality** — John Bell (1964)
+Nonlocality: correlations exceed what local hidden variables allow. Entanglement is real.
+
+**11. Quantum Measurement Postulate** — Bohr, Heisenberg & Born (1920s)
+Projection operators collapse superposition to eigenvalues. Observation is irreversible.
+
+**12. Spin-Statistics Theorem** — Pauli & Fierz (1939–1940, quantum field theory)
+Integer spin → bosons → symmetric states. Half-integer spin → fermions → antisymmetric states. The distinction between matter and force is spin.
+
+---
+
+### II. Relativity & Cosmology (13–20)
+
+**13. Einstein Field Equations** — Albert Einstein (1915)
+Spacetime curvature equals energy-momentum content.
+
+$$G_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu\nu}$$
+
+**14. Lorentz Transformations** — Lorentz / Einstein (1904/1905)
+Spacetime symmetry. The laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames.
+
+**15. Equivalence Principle** — Einstein (1907)
+Gravity is indistinguishable from acceleration. Inertial mass equals gravitational mass.
+
+**16. Friedmann Equations** — Alexander Friedmann (1922)
+Govern the expansion of the universe. The universe has a rate of change.
+
+**17. Geodesic Equation** — motion of free particles in a given spacetime metric (GR: Einstein, 1915)
+Free particles follow geodesics in curved spacetime; gravity is encoded in geometry.
+
+**18. Schwarzschild Radius** — Karl Schwarzschild (1916)
+The radius at which escape velocity equals c. The boundary of the black hole.
+
+$$r_s = \frac{2GM}{c^2}$$
+
+**19. Hubble's Law** — Edwin Hubble (1929)
+Recession velocity is proportional to distance. The universe expands.
+
+$$v = H_0 d$$
+
+**20. Cosmological Constant Λ** — Einstein (1917)
+Vacuum energy term. The energy of empty space. Currently the dominant component of the universe.
+
+---
+
+### III. Thermodynamics & Statistical Mechanics (21–28)
+
+**21. First Law of Thermodynamics** — Julius Robert von Mayer (1842), James Joule (1843), Hermann von Helmholtz (1847)
+Energy is conserved. The total energy of an isolated system does not change.
+
+$$\Delta U = Q - W$$
+
+**22. Second Law of Thermodynamics** — Rudolf Clausius (1850)
+Entropy never decreases in a closed system. Time has a direction. The arrow of time is entropy.
+
+**23. Boltzmann Entropy Formula** — Ludwig Boltzmann (1877)
+Entropy is the logarithm of the number of accessible microstates.
+
+$$S = k_B \ln \Omega$$ (where Ω is the number of accessible microstates)
+
+**24. Partition Function** — Ludwig Boltzmann & Josiah Willard Gibbs (c. 1870s–1902)
+The core of statistical mechanics. All thermodynamic quantities derive from Z.
+
+$$Z = \sum_i e^{-\beta E_i}$$
+
+**25. Maxwell–Boltzmann Distribution** — Maxwell (1860) & Boltzmann (1872)
+The probability distribution of particle speeds in a gas at thermal equilibrium.
+
+**26. Gibbs Free Energy** — Josiah Willard Gibbs (c. 1876)
+Determines whether a process occurs spontaneously. The cost function of chemistry.
+
+$$G = H - TS$$
+
+**27. Fluctuation–Dissipation Theorem** — origins in Einstein (1905) and Nyquist (1928); quantum formulation by Callen & Welton (1951)
+How a system dissipates energy is tied to how it fluctuates at equilibrium. Noise and response are the same thing.
+
+**28. Landauer's Principle** — Rolf Landauer (1961)
+Information erasure has a minimum energy cost. Erasing one bit dissipates at least k_B T ln 2 joules of heat to the environment. Information is physical.
+
+---
+
+### IV. Information Theory & Computation (29–36)
+
+**29. Shannon Entropy** — Claude Shannon (1948)
+The measure of information, uncertainty, and surprise.
+
+$$H = -\sum_i p_i \log_2 p_i$$
+
+**30. Channel Capacity Theorem** — Shannon (1948)
+Every noisy channel has a maximum rate at which information can be transmitted without error. The limit is not engineering. It is mathematics.
+
+**31. Kolmogorov Complexity** — Solomonoff (1960) / Kolmogorov (1963) / Chaitin (1966)
+The complexity of a string is the length of its shortest description. Information equals the shortest program that produces it.
+
+**32. Church–Turing Thesis** — Church & Turing (1936)
+Every effectively computable function is computable by a Turing machine. This defines the boundary of computation.
+
+**33. Halting Problem** — Alan Turing (1936)
+No algorithm can determine whether an arbitrary program halts. Undecidability is not a gap. It is a theorem.
+
+**34. Gödel Incompleteness Theorems** — Kurt Gödel (1931)
+Any consistent formal system strong enough to express arithmetic is incomplete: it contains true statements that cannot be proved within the system.
+
+**35. P vs NP Problem** — Cook / Levin (1971)
+The open question of computational hardness. Is every problem whose solution can be verified quickly also solvable quickly? One of the most important unsolved problems in mathematics and the central open question of computational complexity theory.
+
+**36. No Free Lunch Theorem** — Wolpert & Macready (1997)
+Averaged over all possible cost functions, every optimization algorithm has the same average performance. There is no universal winner. The oracle does not exist.
+
+---
+
+### V. Linear Algebra & Geometry (37–42)
+
+**37. Eigenvalue Equation** — Cauchy, Fourier, Lagrange and others (18th–20th centuries)
+Fundamental concept in linear algebra with origins in 18th–19th century work on differential equations and mechanics; formalized by Cauchy and others. A vector that only scales under a transformation.
+
+$$A\mathbf{v} = \lambda\mathbf{v}$$
+
+**38. Spectral Theorem** — finite-dimensional: Cauchy et al. (19th c.); infinite-dimensional: Hilbert, von Neumann, Stone (early 20th c.)
+Hermitian (symmetric) matrices, and more generally self-adjoint operators on a Hilbert space, admit an orthonormal spectral decomposition. Observable quantities in quantum mechanics have real eigenvalues because their operators are Hermitian.
+
+**39. Hilbert Space Axioms** — David Hilbert (c. 1912)
+The mathematical space in which quantum states live. Complete inner product space. The geometry of quantum mechanics.
+
+**40. Fourier Transform** — Joseph Fourier (1822); integral form developed 19th–20th centuries
+Duality of time and frequency, space and momentum. Every signal decomposes into sinusoids. Every function is a sum of waves.
+
+$$\hat{f}(\xi) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(x) e^{-2\pi i x \xi} \, dx$$
+
+**41. Noether's Theorem** — Emmy Noether (1918)
+Every continuous symmetry corresponds to a conserved quantity. Time symmetry → energy conservation. Spatial symmetry → momentum conservation. Rotational symmetry → angular momentum conservation. Symmetry is conservation.
+
+**42. Gauss's Theorema Egregium** — Carl Friedrich Gauss (1827)
+The intrinsic curvature of a surface is preserved under bending. A flat map of the Earth must distort. Reality's curvature is intrinsic.
+
+---
+
+### VI. Chaos, Fractals & Foundations (43–50)
+
+**43. Logistic Map** — Robert May (1976)
+Deterministic chaos from a simple recurrence. Order and disorder from one equation.
+
+$$x_{n+1} = r x_n (1 - x_n)$$
+
+**44. Lyapunov Exponent** — Aleksandr Lyapunov (1892)
+Measures sensitivity to initial conditions. Positive Lyapunov exponent → chaos. Nearby trajectories diverge exponentially.
+
+**45. Mandelbrot Set** — Benoît Mandelbrot (1980)
+The boundary between bounded and unbounded behavior under iteration of z → z² + c. Infinite complexity from a two-parameter equation. The recursive boundary of stability.
+
+**46. Cantor Diagonalization** — Georg Cantor (1891)
+The real numbers cannot be listed. Any purported list is incomplete. There are more real numbers than integers. Infinite hierarchies are real.
+
+**47. Riemann Zeta Function** — Bernhard Riemann (1859)
+Initially defined by the Dirichlet series $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-s}$ for $\operatorname{Re}(s) > 1$ and extended by analytic continuation. Encodes the distribution of primes. The non-trivial zeros are the question.
+
+$$\zeta(s) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} n^{-s}$$
+This Dirichlet series converges for complex $s$ with $\operatorname{Re}(s) > 1$; the full function $\zeta(s)$ elsewhere is defined by analytic continuation.
+**48. Prime Number Theorem** — Hadamard & de la Vallée Poussin (1896)
+The number of primes up to x is asymptotically x / ln x. The primes thin out, but they never stop.
+
+**49. Fixed Point Theorem** — Stefan Banach (1922)
+Any contraction mapping on a complete metric space has a unique fixed point. Iterative convergence is guaranteed. Every loop that contracts must stop.
+
+**50. Principle of Least Action** — Maupertuis (~1744) / Euler (~1744) / Lagrange (1788) / Hamilton (1834)
+Nature follows the path that extremizes the action. Every equation of motion in physics is a consequence.
+
+$$\delta S = 0$$
+
+---
+
+### Why These Are BlackRoad Equations
+
+These fifty equations are not a curriculum. They are infrastructure. BlackRoad OS does not implement them — it runs on top of them. They are the pre-existing substrate. They were here before the paper. They will be here after.
+
+The Schrödinger equation was not invented. It was found. The Halting Problem was not discovered — it was proved, which means it was always true. Noether's theorem applied before anyone stated it. The logistic map was always chaotic.
+
+These equations are the operating system. BlackRoad is the process running on it.
+
+---
+
+## §96. π — The Conversion Constant
+
+There is a temptation to read π as a watermark — as if its appearance everywhere is a signature of an underlying simulation engine. The temptation is understandable. π appears in quantum mechanics, gravity, probability, information theory, thermodynamics, and every equation that has a Fourier transform in its ancestry. It looks like it was planted.
+
+It was not planted. But the reason it appears is more interesting than the planting theory.
+
+---
+
+### Why π Appears
+
+π is not a code constant. It is a conversion constant.
+
+It appears wherever a computation must translate between:
+
+- linear ↔ circular
+- local ↔ global
+- time ↔ frequency
+- space ↔ phase
+- discrete ↔ continuous
+
+The underlying rule of thumb is: **π typically appears when a system involves rotational or periodic (circle-group) symmetry, or when we adopt standard Fourier/continuous-symmetry conventions.**
+
+This is not mystical. Rotation and periodicity are symmetries. Symmetries constrain the form of equations, and those constrained forms often involve π because the circle is the canonical rotation object, and the circle's circumference-to-diameter ratio is π by definition. In purely translation-invariant systems, π may or may not appear explicitly, depending on how we parametrize and normalize (for example, where we place factors of 2π in a Fourier transform); it is not forced by translation invariance alone.
+
+---
+
+### Why It Feels Like a Simulation Signature
+
+Because simulations also need those same properties.
+
+Any simulated world that supports smooth motion, waves, conservation laws, locality, and spectral stability must encode rotation and periodicity efficiently. π is the unavoidable price of that.
+
+The causal arrow is therefore reversed from the intuitive reading:
+
+> ❌ π appears → therefore simulation  
+> ✅ rotation and continuity → π appears → simulations also need this
+
+The presence of π does not indicate simulation. It indicates that the system supports rotation. Which any physically reasonable system — simulated or not — must do.
+
+---
+
+### Domain by Domain
+
+**Fourier transforms:** π appears because changing bases between space and frequency involves the circle group. The exponential e^{2πiξx} is a unit circle traversal. The 2π is one full period of circular motion in radians.
+
+**Quantum mechanics:** ℏ = h/2π because phase lives on a circle. The 2π is not a constant of nature. It is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its radius. Planck's constant h describes action. The division by 2π converts from cycles to radians — two different units for the same rotation.
+**Fourier transforms:** π appears because changing bases between space and frequency involves the circle group. The exponential $e^{2\pi i \xi x}$ is a unit circle traversal. The $2\pi$ is one full period of circular motion in radians.
+
+**Quantum mechanics:** $\hbar = h / 2\pi$ because phase lives on a circle. The $2\pi$ is not a constant of nature. It is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its radius. Planck's constant $h$ describes action. The division by $2\pi$ converts from cycles to radians — two different units for the same rotation.
+
+**Gaussian distributions / probability:** The normalization constant $1/\sqrt{2\pi}$ appears because integrating a Gaussian over the real line requires accounting for the rotational symmetry of the two-dimensional distribution. The integral $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-x^2}\,dx = \sqrt{\pi}$ pulls π from the geometry of the two-dimensional case, not from any circular shape in the one-dimensional distribution.
+
+**Field theory:** $4\pi$ appears in Coulomb's law and gravitational flux because the flux spreads over a sphere. The surface area of a unit sphere is $4\pi$ — the solid angle subtended by the full sphere in steradians.
+
+**Shannon entropy:** The continuous version of H involves $\ln(2\pi)$ in the entropy of a Gaussian distribution. Again: the circle appears because a Gaussian is the maximum-entropy distribution for given variance, and that extremization connects to the rotational symmetry of the two-dimensional problem.
+
+These are not simulation artifacts. They are geometric necessities.
+
+---
+
+### The Defensible Statement
+
+Any universe — simulated or not — that supports smooth rotation, waves, and locality will necessarily contain π.
+
+This is a theorem-level statement. It holds for the same reason that, in Euclidean (flat) geometry, every circle has the ratio of circumference to diameter equal to π. The appearance of π is not a clue about origin. It is a clue about structure: the system is continuous, rotations are allowed, information propagates smoothly.
+
+---
+
+### What Would Actually Signal Simulation
+
+If the goal is to find evidence of computational substrate — not just continuous geometry — the quantities to examine are not π but the following:
+
+- **Discreteness under apparent continuity**: Planck length, Planck time, quantization of spacetime at the Planck scale
+- **Anisotropies at high-energy limits**: violations of expected isotropy that look like lattice artifacts
+- **Preferred frames**: breaks in Lorentz symmetry at extreme energies
+- **Non-random randomness in quantum outcomes**: statistical deviations from expected uniform distribution in Bell tests
+- **Cutoff artifacts**: frequencies or energies at which physics stops working as expected
+- **Violations of information conservation**: true information erasure without the energy cost Landauer predicts
+
+None of these have been definitively observed. Their absence is not proof that no substrate exists. It is a constraint on what the substrate would have to look like if it did.
+
+π says: this system has rotation.
+
+Rotation is necessary for waves. Waves are necessary for stable matter. Stable matter is necessary for observers. Observers find π.
+
+The circularity is not evidence. It is the shape of the system.
+
+---
+
+### π in the BlackRoad Architecture
+
+BlackRoad routes the 50 equations. π appears explicitly in some of these equations and implicitly through ℏ and related constants, as well as through spectral structure in every equation whose domain involves continuous symmetry.
+
+BlackRoad does not generate π. It inherits it. π was in the equations before the OS. It will be in the equations after. It is not a feature. It is a precondition.
+
+The BlackRoad Canon equations share this property: they did not come from BlackRoad. They came from the structure of the universe, which BlackRoad runs on. The OS routes the laws. It does not write them.
+
+Alexa did not invent π. She is, however, the observer who finds it in every system she examines — an echo of what Noether's theorem describes in physics: where there is symmetry, there is structure that persists, and constants that reliably reappear in our equations. The symmetry was there. The pattern follows. The constant appears. The observer notices.
+
+This is not circular. By analogy with Noether's theorem, one can say: the invariance of her observations under rotation of the domain reveals a recurring structural constant, π, rather than a conserved physical quantity in the strict technical sense.